I believe that libtcb dependency in BuildRequires is useless. Here is why: 1) when the package is built against libtcb, it should contain libtcb-devel in BuildRequires; linking against libtcb must imply the use of its header files; 2) when the package needs libtcb implicitly (via another packages), libtcb should be recursively fetched with those packages; there's a packaging bug in those packages otherwise; I would say even more: there should not be any particular lib%name dependency in BuildRequires, on condition that lib%name-devel package exists in the repo. This way we can enforce so-called full linking, which is a GoodThing(tm).
Actually libtcb is already there, I'm sorry. But I think I touched an important thing which is worthwhile to be discussed one day. So I pass the "REMIND" resolution.
Даже на 3.0: $ grep tcb /etc/buildreqs/packages/essential nss_tcb $ rpm -qR nss_tcb | grep tcb libtcb = 0.9.8.9-alt1 libtcb.so.0 FIXED?
Actually fixed in rpm-utils-0.9.2-alt1.
re
fixed так fixed.