1099 2002-07-15 12:36:03 +0400 more specialized BuildRequires 2014-12-20 16:27:53 +0300 1 1 4 Development Sisyphus rpm-utils unstable all Linux NEW P4 enhancement --- 1 vanyaz nobody at glebfm ldv mike placeholder vt qa-sisyphus oldest_to_newest 1048 0 vanyaz 2002-07-15 12:36:03 +0400 According to <a href="file:///usr/share/doc/rpm-4.0.4/apidocs/tsort.html">file:///usr/share/doc/rpm-4.0.4/apidocs/tsort.html</a> rpm allows BuildRequires-specialization for sections. I suggest to use it in the output of buildreq. I have a reason for this: now, when BuildRequires are not specialized, rpmbuild often doesn\'t want to proceed with some action like \&quot;--clean\&quot; because some of the BuildRequires are not there. This is inconvenient because in most cases the packages listed in BuildRequires are not really required for %clean or a certain other action. I suggest that buildreq generates three kinds of build-dependencies: first, it traces something like \'rpmbuild -bE\' and sees what is required to preprocess the spec; these dependencies are written as BuildPreReq. Then it traces %prep and writes BuildRequires(prep) and then it traces %build and writes BuiildRequires(build). --- --- 0.4.4-alt1 113424 1 mike 2010-10-09 19:01:36 +0400 Isn't it better to fix --clean? The thing is, rpmbuild -bs usually won't need BuildRequires either (might need BuildPreReq though) and still one would cope with --nodeps just to wrap up an srpm.