<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/"
          
          maintainer="jenya@basealt.ru"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1324</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2002-09-28 17:12:40 +0400</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>telinit 1 boots into the default normal runlevel</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-06-13 13:00:40 +0400</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>4</classification_id>
          <classification>Development</classification>
          <product>Sisyphus</product>
          <component>SysVinit</component>
          <version>unstable</version>
          <rep_platform>all</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="imz">vanyaz</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1246</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2002-09-28 17:12:40 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>When I call \&apos;telinit 1\&apos; (as root), all the services are brought down as exepcted. Then there is a pause, and after it some messages appear, among them \&apos;Telling INIT to go to single user mode\&apos;. And after a short while a login prompt appears: the system has been booted into runlevel 3 (the default). The OK messages for the started services doesn\&apos;t show up, but the service are started (syslog logged this).

The same situation when I append \&apos;1\&apos; to the kernel command for GRUB: it boots into runlevel 3 finally.

When \&apos;single\&apos; is appended, it is booted into the sungle user mode as expected.

\&apos;init S\&apos; called from a root shell also asks for the root\&apos;s password and starts a root shell (I expect this to be the final step of \&apos;telinit 1\&apos;).

---

---
$ rpm -q SysVinit initscripts 
SysVinit-2.84-alt4
initscripts-5.49-ipl44mdk
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4156</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2002-09-28 19:11:42 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Surprisingly, removing \&apos;exec \&apos; in /etc/init.d/single made it work correctly. (The patch is attached.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7521</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2002-09-28 19:11:42 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Surprisingly, removing \&apos;exec \&apos; in /etc/init.d/single made it work correctly. (The patch is attached.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4157</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-14 20:46:50 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Applied patch in 5.49-ipl45mdk</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7522</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-14 20:46:50 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Applied patch in 5.49-ipl45mdk</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4158</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-19 23:04:27 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Can this be an error in /sbin/init? And the patch only implemets a work-araound.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7523</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-19 23:04:27 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Can this be an error in /sbin/init? And the patch only implemets a work-araound.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4159</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2002-12-30 01:06:32 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Unable to reproduce all these strange things.

I\&apos;m going to revert this patch and add \&amp;quot;exec\&amp;quot; back to /etc/init.d/single.

Please check this \&amp;quot;exec\&amp;quot; thing again with SysVinit-2.84-alt5.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7524</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2002-12-30 01:06:32 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Unable to reproduce all these strange things.

I\&apos;m going to revert this patch and add \&amp;quot;exec\&amp;quot; back to /etc/init.d/single.

Please check this \&amp;quot;exec\&amp;quot; thing again with SysVinit-2.84-alt5.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4160</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 15:55:07 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>I\&apos;m able to duplicate it with SysVinit-2.84-alt5, initscripts-5.49-ipl48mdk. It happens always.

This time the behaviour is the same, no matter whether \&apos;exec \&apos; is present in /etc/init.d/single: I\&apos;m not able to boot into runlevel 1 (either with telinit 1 or appending 1 in GRUB).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7525</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 15:55:07 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>I\&apos;m able to duplicate it with SysVinit-2.84-alt5, initscripts-5.49-ipl48mdk. It happens always.

This time the behaviour is the same, no matter whether \&apos;exec \&apos; is present in /etc/init.d/single: I\&apos;m not able to boot into runlevel 1 (either with telinit 1 or appending 1 in GRUB).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4161</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:02:44 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Please provide as much information as possible, including your /etc/inittab</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7526</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:02:44 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Please provide as much information as possible, including your /etc/inittab</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4162</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:28:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tested with SysVinit-2.82-alt2.

With \&apos;exec telinit -t1 S\&apos; in /etc/init.d/single: 

after telinit 1, it stops all services, writes \&apos;telling INIT to go into single user mode\&apos; and hangs, does nothing. SysRQ + T shows there 2 init processes and some k*.

After appending 1 in GRUB, it writes after the minimal start-up about going into single user mode, no more start up messages appear, and finally, the system has been booted into runlevel 3 (all the services started).

Without \&apos;exec \&apos;: telinit 1 boots into runlevel 3 (as described: without messages). The same when appending 1 in GRUB.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7527</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:28:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tested with SysVinit-2.82-alt2.

With \&apos;exec telinit -t1 S\&apos; in /etc/init.d/single: 

after telinit 1, it stops all services, writes \&apos;telling INIT to go into single user mode\&apos; and hangs, does nothing. SysRQ + T shows there 2 init processes and some k*.

After appending 1 in GRUB, it writes after the minimal start-up about going into single user mode, no more start up messages appear, and finally, the system has been booted into runlevel 3 (all the services started).

Without \&apos;exec \&apos;: telinit 1 boots into runlevel 3 (as described: without messages). The same when appending 1 in GRUB.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4163</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:46:44 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tested with SysVinit-2.84-alt4 again. The bahaviour is the same, no matter 
whether \&apos;exec \&apos; is there. It writes \&apos;Telling INIT to go to single user mode\&apos; and after a while runlevel 3 is there (the login prompt), no start-up messages appeared before the login screen appeared.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7528</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:46:44 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tested with SysVinit-2.84-alt4 again. The bahaviour is the same, no matter 
whether \&apos;exec \&apos; is there. It writes \&apos;Telling INIT to go to single user mode\&apos; and after a while runlevel 3 is there (the login prompt), no start-up messages appeared before the login screen appeared.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4164</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:58:16 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>1. Does -alt4 and -alt5 behaviour differ? -alt5 is preferred for testing.
2. Please restore CTRL-ALT-DEL default action for a while.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7529</commentid>
    <comment_count>18</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 16:58:16 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>1. Does -alt4 and -alt5 behaviour differ? -alt5 is preferred for testing.
2. Please restore CTRL-ALT-DEL default action for a while.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4165</commentid>
    <comment_count>19</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:01:06 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>1. It seems, no.
2. will do it</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7530</commentid>
    <comment_count>20</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:01:06 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>1. It seems, no.
2. will do it</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4166</commentid>
    <comment_count>21</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:17:57 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Now I\&apos;m using the /etc/inittab from initscripts-5.49-ipl48mdk and SysVinit-2.84-alt5. Nothing changed: after \&apos;Telling INIT to go to single user mode\&apos; no messages appear, but runlevel 3 is booted.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7531</commentid>
    <comment_count>22</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:17:57 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Now I\&apos;m using the /etc/inittab from initscripts-5.49-ipl48mdk and SysVinit-2.84-alt5. Nothing changed: after \&apos;Telling INIT to go to single user mode\&apos; no messages appear, but runlevel 3 is booted.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4167</commentid>
    <comment_count>23</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:28:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>/etc/rc.d/init.d/single: remove exec (if any) and add smth like
echo \&amp;quot;rc=$?\&amp;quot;
right after telinit command. What\&apos;s the rc?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7532</commentid>
    <comment_count>24</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:28:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>/etc/rc.d/init.d/single: remove exec (if any) and add smth like
echo \&amp;quot;rc=$?\&amp;quot;
right after telinit command. What\&apos;s the rc?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4168</commentid>
    <comment_count>25</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:51:10 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>rc=0

But the result became less stable: in 1 of 5 tests, it went into single user mode! A kind of race?

So I appended these lines: $ tail -5 /etc/init.d/single
# Now go to the single user level.
echo \&amp;quot;Telling INIT to go to single user mode.\&amp;quot;
telinit -t1 S
echo \&amp;quot;rc=$?\&amp;quot;
sleep 5 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; echo slept

and now the behaviour is stable and correct. telinit 1 brings the services down, prints \&amp;quot;Telling INIT to go to single user mode.\&amp;quot;, \&amp;quot;rc=0\&amp;quot;, then prints smth like \&amp;quot;Going SINGLE\&amp;quot; and asks for the password. After a while, \&amp;quot;slept\&amp;quot; is printed.

After I give \&amp;quot;exit\&amp;quot; command in the single user mode shell, the system goes into runlevel 3, with all the messages this time.

Appending 1 in GRUB also works fine.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7533</commentid>
    <comment_count>26</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:51:10 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>rc=0

But the result became less stable: in 1 of 5 tests, it went into single user mode! A kind of race?

So I appended these lines: $ tail -5 /etc/init.d/single
# Now go to the single user level.
echo \&amp;quot;Telling INIT to go to single user mode.\&amp;quot;
telinit -t1 S
echo \&amp;quot;rc=$?\&amp;quot;
sleep 5 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; echo slept

and now the behaviour is stable and correct. telinit 1 brings the services down, prints \&amp;quot;Telling INIT to go to single user mode.\&amp;quot;, \&amp;quot;rc=0\&amp;quot;, then prints smth like \&amp;quot;Going SINGLE\&amp;quot; and asks for the password. After a while, \&amp;quot;slept\&amp;quot; is printed.

After I give \&amp;quot;exit\&amp;quot; command in the single user mode shell, the system goes into runlevel 3, with all the messages this time.

Appending 1 in GRUB also works fine.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4169</commentid>
    <comment_count>27</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:59:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Looks like a race.
Could you provide some info from your /proc/cpuinfo?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7534</commentid>
    <comment_count>28</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 17:59:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Looks like a race.
Could you provide some info from your /proc/cpuinfo?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4170</commentid>
    <comment_count>29</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 18:01:07 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 5
model name      : Pentium II (Deschutes)
stepping        : 2
cpu MHz         : 400.917
cache size      : 512 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr
bogomips        : 799.53</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7535</commentid>
    <comment_count>30</comment_count>
    <who name="imz">vanyaz</who>
    <bug_when>2003-01-08 18:01:07 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 5
model name      : Pentium II (Deschutes)
stepping        : 2
cpu MHz         : 400.917
cache size      : 512 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr
bogomips        : 799.53</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>43136</commentid>
    <comment_count>31</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Shigorin">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2006-12-16 15:31:27 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Never saw that...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>71859</commentid>
    <comment_count>32</comment_count>
    <who name="Mikhail Gusarov">dottedmag</who>
    <bug_when>2008-06-13 13:00:39 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext></thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>116</attachid>
            <date>2002-09-28 19:12:05 +0400</date>
            <delta_ts>2002-09-28 19:12:05 +0400</delta_ts>
            <desc>0001324-initscripts-5.49-ipl44mdk-single-no-exec.patch</desc>
            <filename>0001324-initscripts-5.49-ipl44mdk-single-no-exec.patch</filename>
            <type>application/octet-stream</type>
            <size>238</size>
            <attacher name="imz">vanyaz</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC9ldGMvaW5pdC5kL3NpbmdsZS53aXRoRXhlYwlTYXQgU2VwIDI4IDE5OjAyOjI0IDIwMDIK
KysrIC9ldGMvaW5pdC5kL3NpbmdsZQlTYXQgU2VwIDI4IDE4OjM3OjM4IDIwMDIKQEAgLTUxLDQg
KzUxLDQgQEAKIAogIyBOb3cgZ28gdG8gdGhlIHNpbmdsZSB1c2VyIGxldmVsLgogZWNobyAiVGVs
bGluZyBJTklUIHRvIGdvIHRvIHNpbmdsZSB1c2VyIG1vZGUuIgotZXhlYyBpbml0IC10MSBTCitp
bml0IC10MSBTCg==
</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>169</attachid>
            <date>2003-01-08 16:23:00 +0300</date>
            <delta_ts>2003-01-08 16:23:00 +0300</delta_ts>
            <desc>0001324-inittab</desc>
            <filename>0001324-inittab</filename>
            <type>application/octet-stream</type>
            <size>2074</size>
            <attacher name="imz">vanyaz</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">IyAvZXRjL2luaXR0YWI6IGluaXQoOCkgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbi4KIyAkSWQ6IGluaXR0YWIsdiAx
LjQgMjAwMi8wNC8xNSAxNzowMDowNyBsZHYgRXhwICQKCiMgVGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgcnVubGV2ZWwu
CmlkOjM6aW5pdGRlZmF1bHQ6CgojIEJvb3QtdGltZSBzeXN0ZW0gY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbi9pbml0
aWFsaXphdGlvbiBzY3JpcHQuCiMgVGhpcyBpcyBydW4gZmlyc3QgZXhjZXB0IHdoZW4gYm9vdGlu
ZyBpbiBlbWVyZ2VuY3kgKC1iKSBtb2RlLgpzaTo6c3lzaW5pdDovZXRjL3JjLmQvcmMuc3lzaW5p
dAoKIyBXaGF0IHRvIGRvIGluIHNpbmdsZS11c2VyIG1vZGUuCn5+OlM6d2FpdDovc2Jpbi9zdWxv
Z2luCgojIC9ldGMvcmMuZC9yYyBleGVjdXRlcyB0aGUgUyBhbmQgSyBzY3JpcHRzIHVwb24gY2hh
bmdlIG9mIHJ1bmxldmVsLgojCiMgUnVubGV2ZWwgMCBpcyBoYWx0LgojIFJ1bmxldmVsIDEgaXMg
c2luZ2xlLXVzZXIuCiMgUnVubGV2ZWxzIDItNSBhcmUgbXVsdGktdXNlci4KIyBSdW5sZXZlbCA2
IGlzIHJlYm9vdC4KCmwwOjA6d2FpdDovZXRjL3JjLmQvcmMgMApsMToxOndhaXQ6L2V0Yy9yYy5k
L3JjIDEKbDI6Mjp3YWl0Oi9ldGMvcmMuZC9yYyAyCmwzOjM6d2FpdDovZXRjL3JjLmQvcmMgMwps
NDo0OndhaXQ6L2V0Yy9yYy5kL3JjIDQKbDU6NTp3YWl0Oi9ldGMvcmMuZC9yYyA1Cmw2OjY6d2Fp
dDovZXRjL3JjLmQvcmMgNgojIE5vcm1hbGx5IG5vdCByZWFjaGVkLCBidXQgZmFsbHRocm91Z2gg
aW4gY2FzZSBvZiBlbWVyZ2VuY3kuCno2OjY6cmVzcGF3bjovc2Jpbi9zdWxvZ2luCgojIFdoYXQg
dG8gZG8gd2hlbiBDVFJMLUFMVC1ERUwgaXMgcHJlc3NlZC4KI2NhOjAxMjM0NTpjdHJsYWx0ZGVs
Oi9zYmluL3NodXRkb3duIC10MyAtciBub3cKY2E6MDEyMzQ1OmN0cmxhbHRkZWw6aW5pdCAzCgoj
IEFjdGlvbiBvbiBzcGVjaWFsIGtleXByZXNzIChBTFQtVXBBcnJvdykuCmtiOjprYnJlcXVlc3Q6
L2Jpbi9lY2hvICJLZXlib2FyZCBSZXF1ZXN0IC0tIGVkaXQgL2V0Yy9pbml0dGFiIHRvIGxldCB0
aGlzIHdvcmsuIgoKIyBXaGF0IHRvIGRvIHdoZW4gdGhlIHBvd2VyIGZhaWxzL3JldHVybnMuCnBm
Ojpwb3dlcndhaXQ6L2V0Yy9yYy5kL3JjLnBvd2VyZmFpbCBzdGFydApwbjo6cG93ZXJmYWlsbm93
Oi9ldGMvcmMuZC9yYy5wb3dlcmZhaWwgbm93CnBvOjpwb3dlcm9rd2FpdDovZXRjL3JjLmQvcmMu
cG93ZXJmYWlsIHN0b3AKCiMgVGhpbmdzIHRvIHJ1biBpbiBldmVyeSBydW5sZXZlbC4KdWQ6Om9u
Y2U6L3NiaW4vdXBkYXRlCgojIGdldHR5IGludm9jYXRpb25zIGZvciB0aGUgcnVubGV2ZWxzLgoj
CiMgVGhlICJpZCIgZmllbGQgTVVTVCBiZSB0aGUgc2FtZSBhcyB0aGUgbGFzdAojIGNoYXJhY3Rl
cnMgb2YgdGhlIGRldmljZSAoYWZ0ZXIgInR0eSIpLgojCiMgRm9ybWF0OgojICA8aWQ+OjxydW5s
ZXZlbHM+OjxhY3Rpb24+Ojxwcm9jZXNzPgoxOjIzNDU6cmVzcGF3bjovc2Jpbi9taW5nZXR0eSB0
dHkxCjI6MjM0NTpyZXNwYXduOi9zYmluL21pbmdldHR5IHR0eTIKMzoyMzQ1OnJlc3Bhd246L3Ni
aW4vbWluZ2V0dHkgdHR5Mwo0OjIzNDU6cmVzcGF3bjovc2Jpbi9taW5nZXR0eSB0dHk0CjU6MjM0
NTpyZXNwYXduOi9zYmluL21pbmdldHR5IHR0eTUKNjoyMzQ1OnJlc3Bhd246L3NiaW4vbWluZ2V0
dHkgdHR5NgoKIyBFeGFtcGxlIGhvdyB0byBwdXQgYSBnZXR0eSBvbiBhIHNlcmlhbCBsaW5lIChm
b3IgYSB0ZXJtaW5hbCkuCiMKI1QwOjIzOnJlc3Bhd246L3NiaW4vZ2V0dHkgLUwgdHR5UzAgOTYw
MCB2dDEwMAojVDE6MjM6cmVzcGF3bjovc2Jpbi9nZXR0eSAtTCB0dHlTMSA5NjAwIHZ0MTAwCgoj
IEV4YW1wbGUgaG93IHRvIHB1dCBhIGdldHR5IG9uIGEgbW9kZW0gbGluZS4KIwojVDM6MjM6cmVz
cGF3bjovc2Jpbi9tZ2V0dHkgLXgwIC1zIDU3NjAwIHR0eVMzCgojIEZpeCBmb250cyBmb3IgZnJh
bWVidWZmZXIuCmZiOjIzNDU6b25jZTovZXRjL3JjLmQvc2NyaXB0cy9mcmFtZWJ1ZmZlcl9zZXRm
b250CgojIFJ1biBkZXNrdG9wIG1hbmFnZXIgaW4gcnVubGV2ZWwgNQp4OjU6cmVzcGF3bjovZXRj
L1gxMS9wcmVmZG0gLW5vZGFlbW9uCg==
</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>