23174 2010-03-18 00:51:26 +0300 /srv/ftp/ could be a better place than /var/ftp/ 2010-03-19 03:36:04 +0300 1 1 4 Development Sisyphus anonftp unstable all Linux NEW P3 enhancement --- 9402 1 imz placeholder evg glebfm ldv placeholder vt qa-sisyphus oldest_to_newest 107895 0 imz 2010-03-18 00:51:26 +0300 anonftp-3.2-alt1 First, /srv/ftp/ is more compliant with FHS, which in its turn provides a justification for having a common directory for the served data -- http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM . For one thing, using /srv/--a single parent directory to keep the data of one type--would make possible a gross simple configuration of the corresponding mountpoint; the configuration of the /var/ftp/ mountpoint is something discussed in https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9402#c6 , but a distinguished configuration for ftp could be a too fine-grained, inconvenient thing in many cases, as opposed to selecting a storage for all the served data (+ www, etc.) at once. I have looked a little at Google search results, and they show that some other distros use /srv/ftp/ by default, e.g.: http://en.opensuse.org/FTP_Server_HOWTO#Quick_Setup https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/ftp-server.html#vsftpd-anonymous-configuration and some don't want to make the transition: http://bugs.gentoo.org/78934