<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/"
          
          maintainer="jenya@basealt.ru"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>26693</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-12-11 03:32:54 +0400</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>illegal hardcoded RPATH</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-12-27 01:02:30 +0400</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>4</classification_id>
          <classification>Development</classification>
          <product>Sisyphus</product>
          <component>libfreetype-demos</component>
          <version>unstable</version>
          <rep_platform>all</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Valery Inozemtsev">shrek</assigned_to>
          <cc>sbolshakov</cc>
    
    <cc>shrek</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>qa-sisyphus</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127538</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-11 03:32:54 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>/usr/bin/ft* contain illegal RPATH entries:

verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftview: RPATH contains illegal absolute entry &quot;/usr/X11R6/lib&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftview: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftvalid: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftstring: RPATH contains illegal absolute entry &quot;/usr/X11R6/lib&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftstring: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftmulti: RPATH contains illegal absolute entry &quot;/usr/X11R6/lib&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftmulti: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftlint: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftgamma: RPATH contains illegal absolute entry &quot;/usr/X11R6/lib&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftgamma: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftdump: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftdiff: RPATH contains illegal absolute entry &quot;/usr/X11R6/lib&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftdiff: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64:/usr/X11R6/lib
verify-elf: ERROR: ./usr/bin/ftbench: RPATH contains standard path entry &quot;/usr/lib64&quot;: /usr/lib64

(diagnostics made by 4.0.4-alt100.42-2-g5fe9204)

Фикс для этого пакета простой:
sed -ri &apos;s/^(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec|runpath_var)=.*/\1=/&apos; builds/unix/libtool
сразу после %configure.
По идее, %autoreconf тоже должен это исправлять, но я не проверял, могут быть нежелательные побочные эффекты.

P.S. про вред неправильного RPATH можно почитать, например, в
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127540</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-11 04:00:11 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Заодно можно сделать еще две полезные вещи:
- выключить упаковку неиспользуемого в Сизифе libfreetype-devel-static,
- выкинуть уже приложенный (начиная с версии 2.3.8) freetype-2.2.1-memcpy-fix.patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127559</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Repository Robot">repository-robot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-12 15:10:28 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>libbluray-0.2.1-alt2 -&gt; sisyphus:

* Mon Dec 12 2011 Sergey Bolshakov &lt;sbolshakov@altlinux&gt; 0.2.1-alt2
- examples packaged (closes: #26693)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127561</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry V. Levin">ldv</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-12 15:31:30 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; libbluray-0.2.1-alt2 -&gt; sisyphus:
&gt; 
&gt; * Mon Dec 12 2011 Sergey Bolshakov &lt;sbolshakov@altlinux&gt; 0.2.1-alt2
&gt; - examples packaged (closes: #26693)

Это совсем другая история (#26692).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127562</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Sergey Bolshakov">sbolshakov</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-12 15:36:32 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>опечатался, прошу прощения</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>127949</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Repository Robot">repository-robot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-27 01:02:30 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>libfreetype-2.4.8-alt2 -&gt; sisyphus:

* Sat Dec 10 2011 Dmitry V. Levin &lt;ldv@altlinux&gt; 2.4.8-alt2
- Fixed RPATH issue (closes: #26693).</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>