<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/"
          
          maintainer="jenya@basealt.ru"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3028</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2003-09-22 21:10:16 +0400</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>emu10k* OSS modules broken in 2.4.21+?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-08-30 02:29:39 +0400</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>4</classification_id>
          <classification>Development</classification>
          <product>Sisyphus</product>
          <component>kernel-fix-drivers-media</component>
          <version>unstable</version>
          <rep_platform>all</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>2820</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://altlinux.ru/pipermail/community/2003-September/097750.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>3005</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Shigorin">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Sergey Vlasov">vsu</assigned_to>
          <cc>rider</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>qa-sisyphus</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9476</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Shigorin">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2003-09-22 21:10:16 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>seems that emu10k1 support is broken in 2.4.22 (since somewhere in 2.4.21rc it
seems), and $url looks like hint that emu10k module could be broken too.

there was a pointer to sourceforge project that has working version of the driver.

sorry for bad bugreport but should work as a &quot;flag&quot; to fix it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9478</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton Farygin">rider</who>
    <bug_when>2003-09-22 22:00:44 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Патч с обновлением ушел в CVS
Проверена накладываемость, не проверена работоспособность и собираемость. ;-)
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9479</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Anton Farygin">rider</who>
    <bug_when>2003-09-22 22:41:32 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>В CVS ушел патч, который проверен на собираемость в std-up ядре.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>9492</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Shigorin">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2003-09-23 19:57:13 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>#2820 -- оригинальный отчет, который я не смог найти раньше потому, что он был
повешен не на ту компоненту

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2820 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29375</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Shigorin">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-30 02:19:58 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>closing</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29520</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Shigorin">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-08-30 02:29:39 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>closing</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>