<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/"
          
          maintainer="jenya@basealt.ru"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>31390</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-10-22 12:47:08 +0300</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>do not require rpm-build</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-10-28 22:14:50 +0300</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>4</classification_id>
          <classification>Development</classification>
          <product>Sisyphus</product>
          <component>rpm-build-tcl</component>
          <version>unstable</version>
          <rep_platform>all</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ivan Zakharyaschev">imz</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Vladimir D. Seleznev">vseleznv</assigned_to>
          <cc>vseleznv</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>qa-sisyphus</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153234</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ivan Zakharyaschev">imz</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 12:47:08 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>rpm-build-tcl-0.4-alt1

Now, the .spec says:

PreReq: rpm-build &gt;= 4.0.4-alt44

I suggest not to require rpm-build and express the compatibility with Conflicts:

Conflicts: rpm-build &lt; 4.0.4-alt44

Why:
    
rpm-build-tcl goes together with tcl-devel package,
and those who install tcl-devel do not always intend to build RPMs.
    
Those who do intend to build RPMs, install rpm-build anyway.
    
(TODO: decribe this in https://www.altlinux.org/RPM_Macros_Packaging_Policy .)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153235</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ivan Zakharyaschev">imz</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 13:10:17 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>Please approve the small fixes in http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/151970/ (0.4-alt2 in http://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/packages/?p=rpm-build-tcl.git ) if you have nothing against them.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153238</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sergey Bolshakov">sbolshakov</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 14:14:00 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>approved</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153249</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ivan Zakharyaschev">imz</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 15:26:59 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>(В ответ на комментарий №2)
&gt; approved

For some reason, I can&apos;t see your approval on the status page http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/151970/ . It&apos;s still in EPERM state. Has something gone wrong?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153252</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Sergey Bolshakov">sbolshakov</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 16:01:47 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>$ ssh git task show 151970|grep  approved
 200:approved_by=sbolshakov

just rerun task one more time.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>153253</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ivan Zakharyaschev">imz</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-22 16:19:36 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>(В ответ на комментарий №4)
&gt; $ ssh git task show 151970|grep  approved
&gt;  200:approved_by=sbolshakov
&gt; 
&gt; just rerun task one more time.

Thanks for your help!</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>