35216 2018-08-06 11:19:07 +0300 Change ssh conf directory to /etc/ssh 2018-08-08 15:15:08 +0300 1 1 4 Development Sisyphus openssh unstable all Linux NEW https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-3.1 P3 normal --- 1 maksimov glebfm ekorneechev evg glebfm ldv vt qa-sisyphus oldest_to_newest 173189 0 maksimov 2018-08-06 11:19:07 +0300 Since release 3.1 (2004-04-09) default ssh config directory was unified to /etc/ssh Distributions where /etc/ssh is default config dir: * Debian * Ubuntu * Redhat/Fedora * Suse * Gentoo * Arch * Slackware P.s. Can't find distro where /etc/openssh is default config dir. Proposal change: 1) Add symlink /etc/ssh to /etc/openssh/ 2) Add deprecated warning 3) Move /etc/openssh to /etc/ssh. Add symlink /etc/openssh to /etc/ssh 4) Possibly remove symlink Why: Almost all distros use /etc/ssh, so more and more software will hardcode /etc/ssh. No need to have non-standard config directories and hack packages to use them. More scripts will be compatible to ALT Linux. 173251 1 ldv 2018-08-07 15:00:46 +0300 I don't see any point in changing /etc/openssh to anything else, it would just break things without any benefit. I think it's OK to add a compatibility symlink /etc/ssh -> openssh, I don't see any potentially negative effects. 173283 2 maksimov 2018-08-08 15:03:43 +0300 I think that making smth in ALT Linux similar to all other distros is enough to be a benefit. I suggest making changes slowly in few releases in order not to break anything, rather not making them. Let's start from creating symlink /etc/ssh -> /etc/openssh 173284 3 ldv 2018-08-08 15:15:08 +0300 (In reply to comment #2) > I think that making smth in ALT Linux similar to all other distros is enough to > be a benefit. Yes, some level of compatibility might be beneficial, nobody argues about that, but I don't see how a similarity by itself could be beneficial.