7706 2005-08-18 01:21:45 +0400 Choppy sound 2008-09-11 03:28:33 +0400 1 1 4 Development Sisyphus gstreamer-alsa unstable all Linux CLOSED FIXED P2 critical --- 1 mhz icesik mike the_arioch qa-sisyphus oldest_to_newest 28848 0 mhz 2005-08-18 01:21:45 +0400 Sound play is chopped in GStreamer applications (totem, rhythmbox) as of gstreamer-alsa-0.8.9-alt1. 'aplay' plays audio files without defects in the same system. 30509 1 the_arioch 2005-09-14 11:19:45 +0400 amarok plays fine with xine engine. I don';t remember about gstreamer/oss gstreamer/alsa plays choppy with mp3 files with frequency 32, 24 - not 44,1 default. Hardware: Intel 855GM Centrino, AC'97 sound, intel-8x0 kernel module. Let's compare more details ? 30538 2 mhz 2005-09-14 20:28:27 +0400 I have a Terratec DMX 6fire 24/96 (ice1712). I don't think the hardware is at fault though, as aplay and xine seem to have no problems. 30578 3 the_arioch 2005-09-15 19:04:21 +0400 i asked somewhere on our lists - does GStreamer utilize libalsa, which contains a database of sound card features? I got no answer :-) But it is my hypothesis, that sound is choppy, when frequency of sound stream does not match some 'natural' freq. of sound card - and GStreamer does not do any requantization. It is only a hypothesis. Did You note some common conditions when sound is choppy and when it is not ? 30622 4 mhz 2005-09-16 21:34:35 +0400 (In reply to comment #3) > Did You note some common conditions when sound is choppy and when it is not ? It's always choppy when played via GStreamer from all apps using it, and it's not choppy when a test .wav is played via aplay (which uses only alsa libs). Also, when the GStreamer sound output is switched to OSS in the GNOME GStreamer settings dialog, a test sound can be played OK. But Rhythmbox and Totem fail to play via OSS, popping up an error. 30729 5 mhz 2005-09-19 10:02:05 +0400 It's mine now. 37895 6 ender 2006-05-10 09:20:15 +0400 повторяется - sound is choppy in amarok. но и в aplay при выводе через dmix тоже. mplayer играет через dmix нормально. 37898 7 ender 2006-05-10 09:45:52 +0400 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2095 43354 8 mike 2006-12-17 21:34:40 +0300 re 44335 9 icesik 2007-01-09 02:31:17 +0300 re 51581 10 mike 2007-06-19 00:09:11 +0400 rё 72392 11 icesik 2008-06-15 21:12:36 +0400 (In reply to comment #7) > https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2095 Судя по тому что написано в их мантисе, баг уже давно исправлен.