In https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4737#c4 Fabian Grünbichler wrote: I'll give a few examples, but these are just taken at random, and in no way meant as indication that I audited your usage of the code in question or any other packages and that everything not mentioned is compliant! pve-common: your package metadata says it's GPLv3 licensed, while it is AGPL-3.0 or later pve-docs(-generator): licensed under GFDL, patched very crudely, not following section 4 of the license pve-manager: licensed under AGPL-3.0 or later (our code), patched, section 5 of AGPL 3.0 not followed in addition to this, almost all the packages provided by you don't ship our license information and copyright statement(s) - they are contained in the (debian/)"copyright" file in both our git repositories and the resulting binary packages we distribute, but are not shipped by your binary packages AFAICT (I am not an rpm expert, so it is possible I misinterpret something here). last (but not least), you cannot add any restriction like "legal entities can use it for testing but production use requires acquiring licenses or signing a license agreement in written form." on AGPL licensed software, neither on the original one written by us, nor on your patched version.
