Bug 14041

Summary: doesn't show the "hand" sign
Product: Sisyphus Reporter: Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz>
Component: evinceAssignee: Valery Inozemtsev <shrek>
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: qa-sisyphus
Severity: major    
Priority: P2 CC: aris, grenka, lav, msp, shrek, sin
Version: unstable   
Hardware: all   
OS: Linux   
Attachments:
Description Flags
contains the "hand" sign (by means of pifont LaTeX package)
none
the source (run pdflatex on it)
none
hand-dbfont.tex -- another way to get the sign in LaTeX
none
Fresh generated file none

Description Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:32:08 MSK
evince-2.21.1-alt1              
libpoppler-0.6.3-alt1           

The "hand" sign in the attached example (hand-pifont.pdf) is not shown by evince. 

Though, it is shown by acroread-5.09-alt1 or gv-3.6.3-alt1.

The example was generated by pdflatex from the attached hand-pifont.tex
(tetex-latex-2.0-alt3).
Comment 1 Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:34:08 MSK
Created attachment 2384 [details]
contains the "hand" sign (by means of pifont LaTeX package)
Comment 2 Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:34:45 MSK
Created attachment 2385 [details]
the source (run pdflatex on it)
Comment 3 Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:38:47 MSK
I see an empty box with a black frame in evince instead of the sign.
Comment 4 Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:47:46 MSK
Created attachment 2387 [details]
hand-dbfont.tex -- another way to get the sign in LaTeX

There is another way to get this sign in LaTeX, again, the sign is not shown by
evince, epdfview and kdpf in the resulting pdf (and is shown by acroread and
gv).
Comment 5 Ivan Zakharyaschev 2008-01-16 20:49:28 MSK
xpdf-reader-3.02-alt3 shows the sign in this pdf.
Comment 6 Vitaly Lipatov 2008-12-29 02:14:32 MSK
kpdf тоже не показывает. Где-то не тот шрифт подставляется?
Comment 7 Grigory Ustinov 2018-04-05 16:00:37 MSK
Created attachment 7487 [details]
Fresh generated file
Comment 8 Grigory Ustinov 2018-04-05 16:03:23 MSK
Собрал с новым texlive. "Рука" показывается в evince, epdfview и в xpdf-reader.
Полагаю ошибка была всё-таки в latex.
Закрываю баг. Проблема решена.