| Summary: | Requires: dialog OR newt | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Sisyphus | Reporter: | Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar> | ||||
| Component: | alsa-utils | Assignee: | Michael Shigorin <mike> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | qa-sisyphus | ||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P2 | CC: | mike, shrek | ||||
| Version: | unstable | ||||||
| Hardware: | all | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | 4051, 4052 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
fixes are welcome ;-) стоит вообще пользоваться только одним нормальным диалогом. newt когда-нибудь исчезнет из Сизифа со своим подобием dialog. Миша, пересобери с dialog. Created attachment 445 [details]
Вот патч.
Плюс в спек придется добавить Requires: dialog (зависимость не ловится).
applying in 1.0.5-alt2, thanks Патч упомянут в спеке, но не приложен. whooopps alsa-utils-1.0.5-alt3 |
/usr/sbin/alsaconf: [...] if which dialog > /dev/null; then DIALOG=dialog else if which whiptail > /dev/null; then [...] DIALOG=whiptail_wrapper else echo "Error, dialog or whiptail not found." [...] Therefore "Requires: newt" isn't correct. Alsaconf works good without newt and with dialog. But I don't know how to set this requirement :( Newt && dialog could Provides: smth. virtual, but I think it isn't a good idea to do this for one program (alsaconf).