Bug 707

Summary: Bundled HTML documentation is removed and won\'t rebuild without sgml-tools
Product: Sisyphus Reporter: Mikhail Zabaluev <mhz>
Component: muttAssignee: Mikhail Zabaluev <mhz>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P4 CC: glebfm
Version: unstable   
Hardware: all   
OS: Linux   

Description Mikhail Zabaluev 2002-03-13 12:35:27 MSK 
As a result of \&quot;make clean\&quot; at the build stage, the bundled HTML documentation is removed. An attempt to rebuild it fails non-fatally in absence of sgml-tools. It should not be removed in the first place.
---

---
Comment 1 Dmitry V. Levin 2002-03-13 13:28:19 MSK 
There is a BuildRequires: sgml-tools
in mutt.spec; isn\'t it enought for correct build?
Comment 2 Dmitry V. Levin 2002-03-13 13:28:19 MSK 
There is a BuildRequires: sgml-tools
in mutt.spec; isn\'t it enought for correct build?
Comment 3 Mikhail Zabaluev 2002-03-13 13:51:35 MSK 
I think it\'s better to get the files that the author honed,
rather than rely on a process with not quite stable outcome,
on which we get no immediate alarm. OTOH, we might have better
sgml-tools, stylesheets and stuff than what the author has :)
What\'s that \&quot;make clean\&quot; for, anyway?
Comment 4 Mikhail Zabaluev 2002-03-13 13:51:35 MSK 
I think it\'s better to get the files that the author honed,
rather than rely on a process with not quite stable outcome,
on which we get no immediate alarm. OTOH, we might have better
sgml-tools, stylesheets and stuff than what the author has :)
What\'s that \&quot;make clean\&quot; for, anyway?
Comment 5 Dmitry V. Levin 2002-04-04 20:36:45 MSD 
To reflect possible changes.

Or maybe sgml-tools does its work bad?
Comment 6 Dmitry V. Levin 2002-04-04 20:36:45 MSD 
To reflect possible changes.

Or maybe sgml-tools does its work bad?