#1400 – mailbox locking does not work on reiserfs

Bug 1400 - mailbox locking does not work on reiserfs

Summary: mailbox locking does not work on reiserfs

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Sisyphus
Classification:	Development
Component:	uw-imap (show other bugs)
Version:	unstable
Hardware:	all Linux

Importance:	P3 blocker
Assignee:	Ivan Zakharyaschev
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2002-10-12 18:22 MSD by Sergey Vlasov
Modified:	2004-06-03 16:56 MSD (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
0001400-lock1-sim.c (5.48 KB, application/octet-stream) 2002-10-15 22:20 MSD, Sergey Vlasov	no flags	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description

Sergey Vlasov 2002-10-12 18:22:37 MSD

In uw-imap-2001a-alt6 (and probably in other versions) mailbox locking with fcntl() does not work if the mailbox file is on reiserfs - strace does not show any attempts to lock using fcntl(). However, fcntl() locking works on ext2 and ext3; I have not tried other filesystems - there may be more such problems.

The problem was observed with kernel24-up-2.4.18-alt8, reiserfs 3.6.

Seems that src/osdep/unix/nfstnew.c:test_nfs() considers that the mailbox is on a NFS filesystem, therefore fcntl() locking is turned off. This function tries to perform ustat() on the filesystem and checks usbuf.f_tinode; it happens that reiserfs returns -1 in this field.
---

---

Comment 1

imz 2002-10-15 21:50:47 MSD

According to my tests, locking works in uw-imap-2001a-alt6 on ext2, ext3, xfs, jfs and even vfat. Doesn\'t work on reiserfs-3.6. (reiserfs-3.5 test creshed, so no information yet.)

Comment 2

imz 2002-10-15 21:50:47 MSD

According to my tests, locking works in uw-imap-2001a-alt6 on ext2, ext3, xfs, jfs and even vfat. Doesn\'t work on reiserfs-3.6. (reiserfs-3.5 test creshed, so no information yet.)

Comment 3

imz 2002-10-15 21:52:10 MSD

The tests have been done on 2.4.19-alt0.2-up.

Comment 4

imz 2002-10-15 21:52:10 MSD

The tests have been done on 2.4.19-alt0.2-up.

Comment 5

imz 2002-10-15 22:23:16 MSD

I test the locking with help of the simple program (attached; it is very close to how imapd works): I set different kinds of locks and intermix this with accessing the box through imapd (trying to modify it).

Comment 6

imz 2002-10-15 22:23:16 MSD

I test the locking with help of the simple program (attached; it is very close to how imapd works): I set different kinds of locks and intermix this with accessing the box through imapd (trying to modify it).

Comment 7

imz 2002-10-15 23:55:08 MSD

no locking on reiserfs-3.5 as well (the crash I mentioned was probably caused by jfs).

Comment 8

imz 2002-10-15 23:55:08 MSD

no locking on reiserfs-3.5 as well (the crash I mentioned was probably caused by jfs).

Comment 9

imz 2002-11-02 01:28:48 MSK

waiting for the updates for released distros, then will mark it resolved.

Already resolved in uw-imap-2001a-alt8 and pine-4.44L-alt4 in Sisyphus.

Comment 10

imz 2002-11-02 01:28:48 MSK

waiting for the updates for released distros, then will mark it resolved.

Already resolved in uw-imap-2001a-alt8 and pine-4.44L-alt4 in Sisyphus.

Comment 11

Sergey Vlasov 2003-08-25 14:25:44 MSD

Should this bug be closed? Master 2.2 contains the fixed version; update for
Master 2.0 was not prepared...

Comment 12

inger@altlinux.org 2004-06-03 16:41:22 MSD

как я понял сейчас эта бага уже неактуальна. Нечего плодить в bugzilla 
закрытые блоки. Закрываю.

Comment 13

Sergey Vlasov 2004-06-03 16:56:30 MSD

Да, это исправлено уже очень давно.