$ ssh gyle.sec task show 53635 id=53635 locked=no shared=no fail_early=yes test_only=no repo=sisyphus_mipsel owner=recycler state=FAILED try=1 iter=1 100:srpm=rpm-build-4.0.4-alt155.src.rpm 100:userid=recycler From the logs: ## --------------------- ## ## rpm 4.0.4 test suite. ## ## --------------------- ## RPM debugedit 1: debugedit help ok 2: debugedit executable ok 3: debugedit .debug_str objects FAILED (debugedit.at:101) 4: debugedit .debug_str partial FAILED (debugedit.at:132) 5: debugedit .debug_str exe FAILED (debugedit.at:162) 6: debugedit .debug_info objects FAILED (debugedit.at:201) 7: debugedit .debug_info partial FAILED (debugedit.at:224) 8: debugedit .debug_info exe FAILED (debugedit.at:247) 9: debugedit .debug_types objects ok 10: debugedit .debug_types partial ok 11: debugedit .debug_types exe ok 12: debugedit .debug_line objects FAILED (debugedit.at:367) 13: debugedit .debug_line partial FAILED (debugedit.at:389) 14: debugedit .debug_line exe FAILED (debugedit.at:411) 15: debugedit .debug_macro objects ok 16: debugedit .debug_macro partial ok 17: debugedit .debug_macro exe ok ## ------------- ## ## Test results. ## ## ------------- ## ERROR: All 17 tests were run, 9 failed unexpectedly. ## ------------------------- ## ## rpmtests.log was created. ## ## ------------------------- ##
Actually, saving sources into debuginfo packages never worked properly (or at all?) on mipsel. The thing is that on MIPS, traditionally, the debug information is stored in a bit different way. For starters, debugedit should handle .debug_info section even if it has MIPS-specific SHT_MIPS_DWARF type: http://git.altlinux.org/people/iv/packages/?p=rpm-build.git;a=commit;h=1d7d10edd03c2bc6557086eca22a115aa8f9dd00 That, at least, makes rpm-build testsuite pass, but there may be more to it. More testing is surely needed.
Btw, possible, you also need commit like this http://git.altlinux.org/people/vt/packages/?p=rpm-build.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb0b76e75998641fdb94469e381688bcc74e3c8a
(In reply to Vitaly Chikunov from comment #2) > Btw, possible, you also need commit like this > http://git.altlinux.org/people/vt/packages/?p=rpm-build.git;a=commitdiff; > h=bb0b76e75998641fdb94469e381688bcc74e3c8a Thank you for pointing this out. I would expect that something like that is needed, and it's easy to imagine what exectly (R_MIPS_32 reolcation for EM_MIPS and EM_MIPS_RS3_LE machines). But for all the binaries I've seen the relocations for .debug_info section are stored in .rel.debug_info (of type REL) and have value zero, so are "uninteresting": http://git.altlinux.org/people/iv/packages/?p=rpm-build.git;a=blob;f=tools/debugedit.c;h=051eea1227d1411887aef8a02d8d00ff22b834e6#l543 During this weekend, quite a few packages were build with rpm-build with my patch from comment #1, and "Unhandled relocation" error was not triggered in any of them. Is there a way to make our current toolchain to produce a relocation against .debug_info section that would be "interesting" for setup_relbuf?
That bug was only triggered on kernel modules objects (ko).
(In reply to Ivan A. Melnikov from comment #3) > http://git.altlinux.org/people/iv/packages/?p=rpm-build.git;a=blob;f=tools/ > debugedit.c;h=051eea1227d1411887aef8a02d8d00ff22b834e6#l543 Is this commit ready to be merged?
> Is this commit ready to be merged? Yes. It fixes debuginfo generation on mipsel, and makes the tests pass. rpm-build with this commit applied already works in sisyphus_mipsel and p9_mipsel for quite some time, so it's also well tested. I don't seem to need another part Vitaly mentioned in comment #2, even to build debuginfo-enabled kernels, but I still don't now why mipsel is different from other platforms here and how exactly. That's the only thing that was holding me from pushing this change into the Sisyphus rpm-build more eagerly.
This is fixed in debugedit upstream. With the transition to separately-packaged debugedit, this is fixed in Sisyphus and p10, too.
