Bug 1400

Summary:

mailbox locking does not work on reiserfs

Product:

Sisyphus

Reporter:

Sergey Vlasov <vsu>

Component:

uw-imap

Assignee:

Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

blocker

Priority:

CC:

lakostis

Version:

unstable

Hardware:

all

OS:

Linux

Attachments:

Description	Flags
0001400-lock1-sim.c	none

Description

Sergey Vlasov 2002-10-12 18:22:37 MSD

In uw-imap-2001a-alt6 (and probably in other versions) mailbox locking with fcntl() does not work if the mailbox file is on reiserfs - strace does not show any attempts to lock using fcntl(). However, fcntl() locking works on ext2 and ext3; I have not tried other filesystems - there may be more such problems.

The problem was observed with kernel24-up-2.4.18-alt8, reiserfs 3.6.

Seems that src/osdep/unix/nfstnew.c:test_nfs() considers that the mailbox is on a NFS filesystem, therefore fcntl() locking is turned off. This function tries to perform ustat() on the filesystem and checks usbuf.f_tinode; it happens that reiserfs returns -1 in this field.
---

---

Comment 1

imz 2002-10-15 21:50:47 MSD

According to my tests, locking works in uw-imap-2001a-alt6 on ext2, ext3, xfs, jfs and even vfat. Doesn\'t work on reiserfs-3.6. (reiserfs-3.5 test creshed, so no information yet.)

Comment 2

imz 2002-10-15 21:50:47 MSD

According to my tests, locking works in uw-imap-2001a-alt6 on ext2, ext3, xfs, jfs and even vfat. Doesn\'t work on reiserfs-3.6. (reiserfs-3.5 test creshed, so no information yet.)

Comment 3

imz 2002-10-15 21:52:10 MSD

The tests have been done on 2.4.19-alt0.2-up.

Comment 4

imz 2002-10-15 21:52:10 MSD

The tests have been done on 2.4.19-alt0.2-up.

Comment 5

imz 2002-10-15 22:23:16 MSD

I test the locking with help of the simple program (attached; it is very close to how imapd works): I set different kinds of locks and intermix this with accessing the box through imapd (trying to modify it).

Comment 6

imz 2002-10-15 22:23:16 MSD

I test the locking with help of the simple program (attached; it is very close to how imapd works): I set different kinds of locks and intermix this with accessing the box through imapd (trying to modify it).

Comment 7

imz 2002-10-15 23:55:08 MSD

no locking on reiserfs-3.5 as well (the crash I mentioned was probably caused by jfs).

Comment 8

imz 2002-10-15 23:55:08 MSD

no locking on reiserfs-3.5 as well (the crash I mentioned was probably caused by jfs).

Comment 9

imz 2002-11-02 01:28:48 MSK

waiting for the updates for released distros, then will mark it resolved.

Already resolved in uw-imap-2001a-alt8 and pine-4.44L-alt4 in Sisyphus.

Comment 10

imz 2002-11-02 01:28:48 MSK

waiting for the updates for released distros, then will mark it resolved.

Already resolved in uw-imap-2001a-alt8 and pine-4.44L-alt4 in Sisyphus.

Comment 11

Sergey Vlasov 2003-08-25 14:25:44 MSD

Should this bug be closed? Master 2.2 contains the fixed version; update for
Master 2.0 was not prepared...

Comment 12

inger@altlinux.org 2004-06-03 16:41:22 MSD

как я понял сейчас эта бага уже неактуальна. Нечего плодить в bugzilla 
закрытые блоки. Закрываю.

Comment 13

Sergey Vlasov 2004-06-03 16:56:30 MSD

Да, это исправлено уже очень давно.