Bug 25997

Summary:	please add %{_datadir}/%{name}/conf.d to the ghostscript fontpath
Product:	Sisyphus	Reporter:	viy <viy>
Component:	ghostscript	Assignee:	Fr. Br. George <george>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	qa-sisyphus
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	admsasha, aen, george, kirill, ldv, vitty
Version:	unstable
Hardware:	all
OS:	Linux

Description viy 2011-08-06 19:36:38 MSK

fedora use %{_datadir}/%{name}/conf.d as the dir where fonts could place 
language-specific fontmaps.
please add  %{_datadir}/%{name}/conf.d to the ghostscript fontpath
for both flexibility and compatibility.

see ghostscript-9.02-4.fc16.src.rpm for details.

Comment 1 Vitaly Kuznetsov 2011-08-08 10:57:15 MSK

Nowadays %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d doesn't exist at all. In Fedora the whole /usr/share/ghostscript is packaged into filesystem package for unknown (for me) reason. I would like to know filesystem maintainer's opinion on this issue.

Do we need to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem and create /usr/share/filesystem/conf.d there? Otherwise I can add /usr/share/filesystem/conf.d to ghostscript-common.

Comment 2 Dmitry V. Levin 2011-08-08 23:38:08 MSK

(In reply to comment #1)
> Nowadays %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d doesn't exist at all. In Fedora the whole
> /usr/share/ghostscript is packaged into filesystem package for unknown (for me)
> reason.

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302521

> I would like to know filesystem maintainer's opinion on this issue.

No, I don't see any use to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem package.

Even Phil Knirsch admits the ugliness of this suggestion.

Comment 3 viy 2011-08-09 00:47:37 MSK

(В ответ на комментарий №2)
> No, I don't see any use to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem package.
+1 
filesystem pkg is totally unrelated.

Comment 4 Repository Robot 2011-08-09 11:52:07 MSK

ghostscript-9.02-alt3 -> sisyphus:

* Mon Aug 08 2011 Vitaly Kuznetsov <vitty@altlinux> 9.02-alt3
- add /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d to fontpath (ALT #25997)