Summary: | please add %{_datadir}/%{name}/conf.d to the ghostscript fontpath | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Sisyphus | Reporter: | viy <viy> |
Component: | ghostscript | Assignee: | Fr. Br. George <george> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | qa-sisyphus |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | aen, george, kirill, ldv, vitty |
Version: | unstable | ||
Hardware: | all | ||
OS: | Linux |
Description
viy
2011-08-06 19:36:38 MSK
Nowadays %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d doesn't exist at all. In Fedora the whole /usr/share/ghostscript is packaged into filesystem package for unknown (for me) reason. I would like to know filesystem maintainer's opinion on this issue. Do we need to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem and create /usr/share/filesystem/conf.d there? Otherwise I can add /usr/share/filesystem/conf.d to ghostscript-common. (In reply to comment #1) > Nowadays %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d doesn't exist at all. In Fedora the whole > /usr/share/ghostscript is packaged into filesystem package for unknown (for me) > reason. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302521 > I would like to know filesystem maintainer's opinion on this issue. No, I don't see any use to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem package. Even Phil Knirsch admits the ugliness of this suggestion. (В ответ на комментарий №2) > No, I don't see any use to move /usr/share/ghostscript to filesystem package. +1 filesystem pkg is totally unrelated. |