Bug 31390
| Summary: | do not require rpm-build | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Sisyphus | Reporter: | Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz> |
| Component: | rpm-build-tcl | Assignee: | Vladimir D. Seleznev <vseleznv> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | qa-sisyphus |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | vseleznv |
| Version: | unstable | ||
| Hardware: | all | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
Please approve the small fixes in http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/151970/ (0.4-alt2 in http://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/packages/?p=rpm-build-tcl.git ) if you have nothing against them. approved (В ответ на комментарий №2) > approved For some reason, I can't see your approval on the status page http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/151970/ . It's still in EPERM state. Has something gone wrong? $ ssh git task show 151970|grep approved 200:approved_by=sbolshakov just rerun task one more time. |
Description
Ivan Zakharyaschev 2015-10-22 12:47:08 MSKrpm-build-tcl-0.4-alt1 Now, the .spec says: PreReq: rpm-build >= 4.0.4-alt44 I suggest not to require rpm-build and express the compatibility with Conflicts: Conflicts: rpm-build < 4.0.4-alt44 Why: rpm-build-tcl goes together with tcl-devel package, and those who install tcl-devel do not always intend to build RPMs. Those who do intend to build RPMs, install rpm-build anyway. (TODO: decribe this in https://www.altlinux.org/RPM_Macros_Packaging_Policy .)