Bug 16128 - Может стоит перейти на форк http://code.google.com/p/flow-tools/ ?
Summary: Может стоит перейти на форк http://code.google.com/p/flow-tools/ ?
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Sisyphus
Classification: Development
Component: flow-tools (show other bugs)
Version: unstable
Hardware: all Linux
: P2 enhancement
Assignee: Vitaly Lipatov
QA Contact: qa-sisyphus
URL: http://code.google.com/p/flow-tools/
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-21 14:51 MSD by Slava Dubrovskiy
Modified: 2014-01-10 16:00 MSK (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Spec for build 0.68.5.1 (38 bytes, text/plain)
2010-11-12 11:34 MSK, evseev 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Slava Dubrovskiy 2008-06-21 14:51:14 MSD 
Может стоит перейти на форк http://code.google.com/p/flow-tools/ ?
Comment 1 evseev 2010-11-12 11:34:28 MSK 
Created attachment 4654 [details]
Spec for build 0.68.5.1

quick-and-dirty spec-file for build package from latest "-ng" sources.
Comment 2 Vitaly Lipatov 2013-06-30 16:10:17 MSK 
Форк остановился в 2010 году. При работающем нынешнем пакете пока смысла не вижу.
Comment 3 Repository Robot 2013-07-03 17:22:11 MSK 
flow-tools-ng-0.68.5-alt1 -> sisyphus:

* Tue Jul 02 2013 Vitaly Lipatov <lav@altlinux> 0.68.5-alt1
- initial build flow-tools fork for ALT Linux Sisyphus (ALT bug #16128)
Comment 4 Sergey Y. Afonin 2014-01-10 15:02:32 MSK 
А какой сейчас смысл в flow-tools без v9, и, следовательно, IPv6 ?
http://code.google.com/p/flow-tools/issues/detail?id=16
Comment 5 Slava Dubrovskiy 2014-01-10 15:24:24 MSK 
не знаю. Я вообще юзаю pmacc
Comment 6 Sergey Y. Afonin 2014-01-10 16:00:11 MSK 
(In reply to comment #5)

А у python-module-pyflowtools проблема, в итоге...
http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/198203.html

Я, кстати, nfdump использую.