pine-4.64L-alt6 After the installation of the package, verification detects changes: $ rpm -V pine S.5....T c /etc/pine.conf $ This is due to the generation of /etc/pine.conf with comments and such that would incorporate the old config file (with possibly some changes done by the administrator). When doing "rpm -V", the verifyscript should ignore the non-substantial differences (comments, order) in order to be more informative. Either the verifyscript could use filterpineconf. Or the package could include an already expanded version of /etc/pine.conf (generated from the concise packager's intentions with comments): then "rpm -V" wouldn't show anything if the configuration wasn't modified. The short source pine.conf cpuld be put into /usr/share/doc then, so that one can study the packager's intentions in concise form.
just resubmit your gpg and rsa/dsa more details on key http://www.altlinux.org/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2_Team like I did for repocop https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22132 and I gladly give you the package.
> and I gladly give you the package. we already discussed this, remember?
(В ответ на комментарий №0) > When doing "rpm -V", the verifyscript should ignore the non-substantial > differences (comments, order) in order to be more informative. Didn't know of this feature but still FRs like this look better with a patch. :)
Если правильно понимаю http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-scripts.html#S2-RPM-INSIDE-VERIFYSCRIPT-SCRIPT в части "Since RPM automatically verifies the existence of a package's files, along with other file attributes, the %verifyscript should concentrate on different aspects of the package's installation" -- это NOTABUG.
Пакет pine удалён из Сизифа заданием 218284.100 (21.12.2018), неактуально.
