pinfo-0.6.9-alt1 Just the same as https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140 for lynx.
This bad behavior is not observed in ALT Lite 4.0.3 -- ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/distributions/ALTLinux/4.0/Desktop/4.0.3/iso/altlinux-4.0.3-lite-i586-install_ru-cd.iso ; the version there: pinfo-0.6.9-alt1, so the problem is perhaps not in pinfo, but in something it depends upon. In ALT Lite 4.0.3 (where it works OK) the versions are: apt> depends pinfo pinfo-0.6.9-alt1 Depends: url_handler PreDepends: </sbin/install-info> info-install-4.8-alt4 PreDepends: </bin/sh> sh-3.1.17-alt3 PreDepends: </bin/sh> sh-3.1.17-alt3 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)> glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)> glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)> glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)> glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 Depends: <libncurses.so.5> libncurses-5.6-alt3 Depends: <libtinfo.so.5> libtinfo-5.6-alt3 apt>
(In reply to comment #1) > the problem is perhaps not in pinfo, but > in something it depends upon. In the system where I noticed the problem the versions of the dependencies are: apt> depends pinfo pinfo-0.6.9-alt1 Depends: url_handler PreDepends: </sbin/install-info> info-install-4.11-alt3 PreDepends: </bin/sh> sh-3.2.39-alt1 PreDepends: </bin/sh> sh-3.2.39-alt1 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)> glibc-core-6:2.5.1-alt5 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)> glibc-core-6:2.5.1-alt5 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)> glibc-core-6:2.5.1-alt5 Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)> glibc-core-6:2.5.1-alt5 Depends: <libncurses.so.5> libncurses-5.6-alt4 Depends: <libtinfo.so.5> libtinfo-5.6-alt4 apt> > In ALT Lite 4.0.3 (where it works OK) the versions are: > > apt> depends pinfo > pinfo-0.6.9-alt1 > Depends: url_handler > PreDepends: </sbin/install-info> > info-install-4.8-alt4 > PreDepends: </bin/sh> > sh-3.1.17-alt3 > PreDepends: </bin/sh> > sh-3.1.17-alt3 > Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)> > glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 > Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)> > glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 > Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)> > glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 > Depends: <libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)> > glibc-core-6:2.5-alt4 > Depends: <libncurses.so.5> > libncurses-5.6-alt3 > Depends: <libtinfo.so.5> > libtinfo-5.6-alt3 > apt> >
(In reply to comment #1) > so the problem is perhaps not in pinfo, but > in something it depends upon. The other thing that differs between the two cases is the locale. In the "bad" case: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R LC_MESSAGES=POSIX in the good case: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 .
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > so the problem is perhaps not in pinfo, but > > in something it depends upon. > > The other thing that differs between the two cases is the locale. No, it is not the reason (the locale or old libs): this problem is also observed in a clean Desktop 4.1.1RC system in ru_RU.UTF-8: https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18409 . > > In the "bad" case: > > LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R > LC_MESSAGES=POSIX > > in the good case: > > LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 > > . >
Рискну предположить, что всё это происходит в aterm? Если да, то это его (aterm'а) неадекватная реакция на попытку использования мыши (mousemask() из libncurses).
исправление https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19732 заодно исправило и эту ошибку.
сборка добежала до сизифа, на utf8 консолях чисто, в других локалях прошу проверки.
ru_RU.KOI8-R - полёт нормальный.
значит закрываю :)
